A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Baggaley Andrew
Pitchford Liam

Wins: 2

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 0.33

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 3491

R_1,2,3: 3194

R_min: 3542

R_1,2,3: 3636

Synergistic effect: 0.97

№2

Pair: Baggaley Andrew
Reed Daniel

Wins: 5

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1.67

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 3458

R_1,2,3: 3074

R_min: 2979

R_1,2,3: 3766

Synergistic effect: 0.82

№3

Pair: Baggaley Andrew
Rumgay Gavin

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2665

R_1,2,3: 2665

R_min: 4379

R_1,2,3: 4379

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Baggaley Andrew
Doran Christopher

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2086

R_1,2,3: 2086

R_min: 3688

R_1,2,3: 3688

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Baggaley Andrew
Duran Marc

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 846

R_1,2,3: 846

R_min: 3332

R_1,2,3: 3332

Synergistic effect: 0.92

№6

Pair: Baggaley Andrew
Drinkhall Paul

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3018

R_1,2,3: 3228

Synergistic effect: 0.88

№7

Pair: Baggaley Andrew
Knight Darius

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2374

R_1,2,3: 3146

Synergistic effect: 0.8