A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Ben Ari Omri
Tauber Michael

Wins: 3

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1.5

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 4721

R_1,2,3: 1718

R_min: 5022

R_1,2,3: 16071

Synergistic effect: 1.74

№2

Pair: Ben Ari Omri
Rabinovich Shimon

Wins: 4

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1.33

Number of matches: 7

R_max: 3600

R_1,2,3: 2134

R_min: 3424

R_1,2,3: 3880

Synergistic effect: 1.15

№3

Pair: Ben Ari Omri
Simon Mathan

Wins: 4

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 3383

R_1,2,3: 3015

R_min: 2960

R_1,2,3: 3511

Synergistic effect: 1.14

№4

Pair: Kovac Borna
Ben Ari Omri

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3796

R_1,2,3: 3796

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Michely Gilles
Ben Ari Omri

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3640

R_1,2,3: 3640

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Ben Ari Omri
Doran Christopher

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3751

R_1,2,3: 3751

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Davidovitz Ron
Ben Ari Omri

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1563

R_1,2,3: 1563

Synergistic effect: 0.57

№8

Pair: Elensky Gregory
Ben Ari Omri

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2911

R_1,2,3: 2911

Synergistic effect: 0.23