A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Barendregt Alice
Eerland Britt

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 3526

R_1,2,3: 3526

R_min: 4745

R_1,2,3: 4745

Synergistic effect: 1.03

№2

Pair: Nagyvaradi Mercedes
Barendregt Alice

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 3138

R_1,2,3: 2100

R_min: 3098

R_1,2,3: 3098

Synergistic effect: 0.93

№3

Pair: Aschwanden Rahel
Barendregt Alice

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 3054

R_1,2,3: 2396

R_min: 3490

R_1,2,3: 3490

Synergistic effect: 1.04

№4

Pair: Barendregt Alice
Vermaas Kim

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 2923

R_1,2,3: 2923

R_min: 3183

R_1,2,3: 3257

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Barendregt Alice
Maksuti Aneta

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 2829

R_1,2,3: 2598

R_min: 3143

R_1,2,3: 3143

Synergistic effect: 0.96

№6

Pair: Barendregt Alice
Van Duin Rianne

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 2682

R_1,2,3: 2542

R_min: 3167

R_1,2,3: 3361

Synergistic effect: 1.03

№7

Pair: Barendregt Alice
Overbeeke Dianne

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3399

R_1,2,3: 3399

Synergistic effect: -