A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Lambiet Florent
Allegro Martin

Wins: 65

Defeats: 77

Ratio: 0.84

Number of matches: 142

R_max: 22305

R_1,2,3: 18742

R_min: 275

R_1,2,3: 367

Synergistic effect: 1.05

№2

Pair: Jean Lauric
Allegro Martin

Wins: 7

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 1.17

Number of matches: 13

R_max: 4324

R_1,2,3: 3945

R_min: 3559

R_1,2,3: 3846

Synergistic effect: 1.17

№3

Pair: Allegro Martin
Lambiet Romain

Wins: 16

Defeats: 11

Ratio: 1.45

Number of matches: 27

R_max: 2950

R_1,2,3: 2406

R_min: 385

R_1,2,3: 1397

Synergistic effect: 1.17

№4

Pair: Allegro Martin
Rassenfosse Adrien

Wins: 7

Defeats: 9

Ratio: 0.78

Number of matches: 16

R_max: 2785

R_1,2,3: 1124

R_min: 87

R_1,2,3: 182

Synergistic effect: 1.57

№5

Pair: Allegro Martin
Bilas Arthur

Wins: 5

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 0.83

Number of matches: 11

R_max: 1722

R_1,2,3: 1507

R_min: 1314

R_1,2,3: 1514

Synergistic effect: 0.76

№6

Pair: Allegro Martin
Merckx Jasper

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1706

R_1,2,3: 1706

R_min: 2313

R_1,2,3: 2313

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Allegro Martin
Cnudde Florian

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 594

R_1,2,3: 594

R_min: 3639

R_1,2,3: 3639

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Allegro Martin
Kubik Maciej

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 177

R_1,2,3: 177

R_min: 181

R_1,2,3: 181

Synergistic effect: 0.43

№9

Pair: Allegro Martin
Rolland Jules

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 853

R_1,2,3: 853

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Allegro Martin
Jarvis Tom

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 274

R_1,2,3: 274

Synergistic effect: 0.83