A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Cathcart Dillon
Van Der Heiden Nathan

Wins: 5

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 2.5

Number of matches: 7

R_max: 2248

R_1,2,3: 1792

R_min: 2564

R_1,2,3: 2859

Synergistic effect: 1.91

№2

Pair: Cathcart Dillon
Tsao Erny

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 1882

R_1,2,3: 1618

R_min: 2704

R_1,2,3: 2704

Synergistic effect: 1.25

№3

Pair: Hu Heming
Cathcart Dillon

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 977

R_1,2,3: 977

R_min: 2399

R_1,2,3: 2399

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Cathcart Dillon
Lim Zheng Jie Edric

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2458

R_1,2,3: 2458

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Cathcart Dillon
Sulfaro Ivan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2391

R_1,2,3: 2391

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Cathcart Dillon
Yan Minghui

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2440

R_1,2,3: 2501

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Cathcart Dillon
Fielding David

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 2674

R_1,2,3: 2674

Synergistic effect: -