A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Chomis Marion
Soposki Roza

Wins: 24

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 4

Number of matches: 30

R_max: 2979

R_1,2,3: 2804

R_min: 2575

R_1,2,3: 2648

Synergistic effect: 1.03

№2

Pair: Chasselin Pauline
Soposki Roza

Wins: 5

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1.67

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 2876

R_1,2,3: 2603

R_min: 2491

R_1,2,3: 3192

Synergistic effect: 1.01

№3

Pair: Migot Marie
Soposki Roza

Wins: 4

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 4

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 2453

R_1,2,3: 2307

R_min: 2805

R_1,2,3: 2805

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Zarif Audrey
Soposki Roza

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2353

R_1,2,3: 2353

R_min: 2737

R_1,2,3: 2737

Synergistic effect: 0.89

№5

Pair: Soposki Roza
Ogrine Pauline

Wins: 3

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 2173

R_1,2,3: 1706

R_min: 2234

R_1,2,3: 2483

Synergistic effect: 0.94

№6

Pair: Soposki Roza
Guisnel Oceane

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 2024

R_1,2,3: 1997

R_min: 3026

R_1,2,3: 3345

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Soposki Roza
Hojlund Emma

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1990

R_1,2,3: 1990

R_min: 2446

R_1,2,3: 2446

Synergistic effect: 1.6

№8

Pair: Escartin Nora
Soposki Roza

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 4510

R_1,2,3: 4510

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Soposki Roza
Lennon Emmanuelle

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3881

R_1,2,3: 3881

Synergistic effect: -