A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Koefoed Nicoline
Walloe Sophie

Wins: 8

Defeats: 8

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 16

R_max: 2746

R_1,2,3: 2527

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 1841

Synergistic effect: 1.21

№2

Pair: Kato Yuko
Koefoed Nicoline

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2334

R_1,2,3: 2334

R_min: 3840

R_1,2,3: 3840

Synergistic effect: -

№3

Pair: Egeholt Sofie
Koefoed Nicoline

Wins: 2

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 2186

R_1,2,3: 1912

R_min: 1020

R_1,2,3: 2114

Synergistic effect: 1.05

№4

Pair: Carey Charlotte
Koefoed Nicoline

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 4374

R_1,2,3: 4374

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Koefoed Nicoline
Eriksson Sofie

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2631

R_1,2,3: 2631

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Koefoed Nicoline
Kellermann Sophia

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2927

R_1,2,3: 2927

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Koefoed Nicoline
Iyer Anisha

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3049

R_1,2,3: 3049

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Koefoed Nicoline
Steffens Louise

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2339

R_1,2,3: 2339

Synergistic effect: -