A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Hennig Sven
Hippler Tobias

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 2507

R_1,2,3: 1189

R_min: 2489

R_1,2,3: 2489

Synergistic effect: 1.11

№2

Pair: Kolodziejczyk Maciej
Hennig Sven

Wins: 4

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 4

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 1522

R_1,2,3: 1249

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: 1.05

№3

Pair: Fadeev Kirill
Hennig Sven

Wins: 11

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 2.2

Number of matches: 16

R_max: 1420

R_1,2,3: 1330

R_min: 972

R_1,2,3: 1048

Synergistic effect: 1.78

№4

Pair: Hennig Sven
Rinderer Daniel

Wins: 5

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 1.25

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 1411

R_1,2,3: 1243

R_min: 895

R_1,2,3: 1252

Synergistic effect: 1.2

№5

Pair: Hennig Sven
Stumper Kay

Wins: 4

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 1071

R_1,2,3: 357

R_min: 905

R_1,2,3: 1157

Synergistic effect: 1.04

№6

Pair: Martin Cornelius
Hennig Sven

Wins: 3

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 778

R_1,2,3: 376

R_min: 549

R_1,2,3: 796

Synergistic effect: 1.87

№7

Pair: Hennig Sven
Meissner Cedric

Wins: 3

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1.5

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 308

R_1,2,3: 148

R_min: 563

R_1,2,3: 1324

Synergistic effect: 0.29

№8

Pair: Hennig Sven
Southall Keenan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 235

R_1,2,3: 235

Synergistic effect: 0.29

№9

Pair: Hennig Sven
Janicki Adam

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 776

R_1,2,3: 776

Synergistic effect: 0.99