A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Shushan Eitay
Almor Uri

Wins: 7

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 1.75

Number of matches: 11

R_max: 1450

R_1,2,3: 594

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -

№2

Pair: Krashynski Yauheni
Almor Uri

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 180

R_1,2,3: 180

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: 1.5

№3

Pair: Avivi Itay
Almor Uri

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 54

R_1,2,3: 27

R_min: 365

R_1,2,3: 365

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Almor Uri
Trosman Idan

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 4

R_1,2,3: 4

R_min: 22

R_1,2,3: 22

Synergistic effect: 0.73

№5

Pair: Oprea Luca
Almor Uri

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 12

R_1,2,3: 12

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Almor Uri
Abramov Natanel

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 17

R_1,2,3: 18

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Izzo Giacomo
Almor Uri

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 4

R_1,2,3: 4

Synergistic effect: 0.33