A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Cloos Jim
Zakharov Dmitry

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1184

R_1,2,3: 1184

R_min: 1942

R_1,2,3: 1942

Synergistic effect: -

№2

Pair: Cloos Jim
Frost Dany

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 1140

R_1,2,3: 1140

R_min: 1839

R_1,2,3: 1862

Synergistic effect: 1.58

№3

Pair: Cloos Jim
Daix Pol

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1775

R_1,2,3: 1775

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Cloos Jim
Urbing Vincent

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1339

R_1,2,3: 1712

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Cloos Jim
Dal Zotto Alessio

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1732

R_1,2,3: 1732

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Cloos Jim
Wong Ho Hin

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1667

R_1,2,3: 1667

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Cekic Irfan
Cloos Jim

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2013

R_1,2,3: 2013

Synergistic effect: 0.96