A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Bates Emily
Istrate Roxana

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 2839

R_1,2,3: 2577

R_min: 3058

R_1,2,3: 3058

Synergistic effect: 0.95

№2

Pair: Bates Emily
Armitage Tressa

Wins: 4

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.8

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 2525

R_1,2,3: 2316

R_min: 3037

R_1,2,3: 3196

Synergistic effect: -

№3

Pair: Hicks Hannah
Bates Emily

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3472

R_1,2,3: 3704

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Bates Emily
King Yolanda

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2981

R_1,2,3: 2981

Synergistic effect: -