A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Burgis Matiss
Achanta Sharath Kamal

Wins: 3

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1.5

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 4057

R_1,2,3: 3669

R_min: 3233

R_1,2,3: 3507

Synergistic effect: 0.95

№2

Pair: Burgis Matiss
Skachkov Kirill

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 3472

R_1,2,3: 3472

R_min: 3691

R_1,2,3: 3691

Synergistic effect: 0.96

№3

Pair: Burgis Matiss
Aguirre Marcelo

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 3197

R_1,2,3: 1959

R_min: 4306

R_1,2,3: 4306

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Agurjanovs Vladislavs
Burgis Matiss

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1939

R_1,2,3: 1939

R_min: 3219

R_1,2,3: 3219

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Burgis Matiss
Henzell William

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1836

R_1,2,3: 1836

R_min: 3371

R_1,2,3: 3371

Synergistic effect: 0.9

№6

Pair: Burgis Matiss
Burgis Reinis

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1030

R_1,2,3: 1030

R_min: 3458

R_1,2,3: 3458

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Burgis Matiss
Hotz Christian

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3399

R_1,2,3: 3399

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Burgis Matiss
Jancarik Lubomir

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 4257

R_1,2,3: 4257

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Burgis Matiss
Platonov Pavel

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3840

R_1,2,3: 3840

Synergistic effect: 0.98