A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Fegerl Stefan
Feng Xiaoquan

Wins: 22

Defeats: 17

Ratio: 1.29

Number of matches: 39

R_max: 3959

R_1,2,3: 3951

R_min: 3085

R_1,2,3: 3151

Synergistic effect: 1.02

№2

Pair: Feng Xiaoquan
Plattner Dominique

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 3610

R_1,2,3: 2360

R_min: 3276

R_1,2,3: 3276

Synergistic effect: 1.21

№3

Pair: Feng Xiaoquan
Poungsri Max

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1165

R_1,2,3: 1165

R_min: 4640

R_1,2,3: 4640

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Feng Xiaoquan
Achanta Sharath Kamal

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 4464

R_1,2,3: 4464

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Feng Xiaoquan
Soderlund Hampus

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 4770

R_1,2,3: 4770

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Feng Xiaoquan
Leitgeb Stefan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3545

R_1,2,3: 3545

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Feng Xiaoquan
Storf Martin

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3115

R_1,2,3: 3115

Synergistic effect: 0.98