A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Konecny Tomas
Tregler Tomas

Wins: 22

Defeats: 18

Ratio: 1.22

Number of matches: 40

R_max: 4695

R_1,2,3: 4403

R_min: 1966

R_1,2,3: 2445

Synergistic effect: 0.89

№2

Pair: Konecny Tomas
Polansky Tomas

Wins: 10

Defeats: 10

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 20

R_max: 4221

R_1,2,3: 4078

R_min: 414

R_1,2,3: 2431

Synergistic effect: 0.78

№3

Pair: Konecny Tomas
Sirucek Pavel

Wins: 3

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 4028

R_1,2,3: 3249

R_min: 3729

R_1,2,3: 4083

Synergistic effect: 1.01

№4

Pair: Konecny Tomas
Prokopcov Dmitrij

Wins: 8

Defeats: 9

Ratio: 0.89

Number of matches: 17

R_max: 3860

R_1,2,3: 3750

R_min: 3035

R_1,2,3: 3368

Synergistic effect: 0.84

№5

Pair: Jancarik Lubomir
Konecny Tomas

Wins: 4

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.8

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 3809

R_1,2,3: 3515

R_min: 2495

R_1,2,3: 3003

Synergistic effect: 0.8

№6

Pair: Konecny Tomas
Reitspies David

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 1375

R_1,2,3: 1170

R_min: 3186

R_1,2,3: 5897

Synergistic effect: 0.52

№7

Pair: Karakasevic Aleksandar
Konecny Tomas

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3975

R_1,2,3: 3975

Synergistic effect: 0.93

№8

Pair: Konecny Tomas
Liventsov Alexey

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3782

R_1,2,3: 3782

Synergistic effect: 0.92

№9

Pair: Konecny Tomas
Obeslo Michal

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3041

R_1,2,3: 3041

Synergistic effect: 0.87