A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Reed Daniel
Walker Samuel

Wins: 4

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 4

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 4888

R_1,2,3: 4178

R_min: 4572

R_1,2,3: 4572

Synergistic effect: 1.17

№2

Pair: Knight Darius
Reed Daniel

Wins: 8

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 1.33

Number of matches: 14

R_max: 3970

R_1,2,3: 3856

R_min: 2933

R_1,2,3: 3112

Synergistic effect: 1.11

№3

Pair: Baggaley Andrew
Reed Daniel

Wins: 5

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1.67

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 3458

R_1,2,3: 3074

R_min: 2979

R_1,2,3: 3766

Synergistic effect: 0.82

№4

Pair: Reed Daniel
Doran Christopher

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 2605

R_1,2,3: 2605

R_min: 3770

R_1,2,3: 3837

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Reed Daniel
Harrison Adam

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1643

R_1,2,3: 1643

R_min: 3351

R_1,2,3: 3351

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Reed Daniel
Zwickl Daniel

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3293

R_1,2,3: 3293

Synergistic effect: -