A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Persolja Ludvik
Horvat Gorazd

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 4050

R_1,2,3: 3543

R_min: 3945

R_1,2,3: 3945

Synergistic effect: 2.08

№2

Pair: Persolja Ludvik
Kozul Deni

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 3191

R_1,2,3: 3191

R_min: 3774

R_1,2,3: 3774

Synergistic effect: 1.31

№3

Pair: Sukic Patrik
Persolja Ludvik

Wins: 4

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.8

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 2804

R_1,2,3: 1953

R_min: 2129

R_1,2,3: 2342

Synergistic effect: 1.3

№4

Pair: Persolja Ludvik
Jorgic Darko

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2603

R_1,2,3: 2603

R_min: 3574

R_1,2,3: 3574

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Persolja Ludvik
Krusic Luka

Wins: 2

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0.67

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 2407

R_1,2,3: 2185

R_min: 2100

R_1,2,3: 2156

Synergistic effect: 1.52

№6

Pair: Lasan Sas
Persolja Ludvik

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 4047

R_1,2,3: 4047

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Persolja Ludvik
Novak Tilen

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2507

R_1,2,3: 2507

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Persolja Ludvik
Sfiligoj Tom

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3008

R_1,2,3: 3268

Synergistic effect: -