A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Lee Ho Ching
Doo Hoi Kem

Wins: 78

Defeats: 51

Ratio: 1.53

Number of matches: 129

R_max: 17229

R_1,2,3: 14681

R_min: 2911

R_1,2,3: 3477

Synergistic effect: 0.86

№2

Pair: Doo Hoi Kem
Zhu Chengzhu

Wins: 27

Defeats: 17

Ratio: 1.59

Number of matches: 44

R_max: 7020

R_1,2,3: 5285

R_min: 185

R_1,2,3: 203

Synergistic effect: 0.57

№3

Pair: Jiang Huajun
Doo Hoi Kem

Wins: 4

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.8

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 5873

R_1,2,3: 4931

R_min: 4567

R_1,2,3: 5170

Synergistic effect: 1

№4

Pair: Tie Yana
Doo Hoi Kem

Wins: 5

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1.67

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 5156

R_1,2,3: 4958

R_min: 4786

R_1,2,3: 5481

Synergistic effect: 0.86

№5

Pair: Ng Wing Nam
Doo Hoi Kem

Wins: 3

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1.5

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 4799

R_1,2,3: 4563

R_min: 4534

R_1,2,3: 5249

Synergistic effect: 0.8

№6

Pair: Li Ching Wan
Doo Hoi Kem

Wins: 24

Defeats: 13

Ratio: 1.85

Number of matches: 37

R_max: 4583

R_1,2,3: 4280

R_min: 3414

R_1,2,3: 3512

Synergistic effect: 1

№7

Pair: Doo Hoi Kem
Mak Tze Wing

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 4376

R_1,2,3: 4089

R_min: 5675

R_1,2,3: 5675

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Soo Wai Yam Minnie
Doo Hoi Kem

Wins: 36

Defeats: 14

Ratio: 2.57

Number of matches: 50

R_max: 3998

R_1,2,3: 3779

R_min: 1626

R_1,2,3: 2393

Synergistic effect: 0.87

№9

Pair: Doo Hoi Kem
Lam Yee Lok

Wins: 12

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 4

Number of matches: 15

R_max: 3895

R_1,2,3: 3746

R_min: 3546

R_1,2,3: 3701

Synergistic effect: 0.9

№10

Pair: Doo Hoi Kem
Liu Gaoyang

Wins: 4

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 4

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 3302

R_1,2,3: 3001

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: -

№11

Pair: Guan Mengyuan
Doo Hoi Kem

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 4290

R_1,2,3: 4290

Synergistic effect: -