A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Degraef Margo
Lung Lisa

Wins: 14

Defeats: 16

Ratio: 0.88

Number of matches: 30

R_max: 4302

R_1,2,3: 3732

R_min: 1067

R_1,2,3: 2021

Synergistic effect: 0.8

№2

Pair: Marchetti Nathalie
Degraef Margo

Wins: 1

Defeats: 16

Ratio: 0.06

Number of matches: 17

R_max: 3428

R_1,2,3: 3428

R_min: 23

R_1,2,3: 48

Synergistic effect: 0.47

№3

Pair: Loyen Eline
Degraef Margo

Wins: 11

Defeats: 19

Ratio: 0.58

Number of matches: 30

R_max: 3006

R_1,2,3: 2854

R_min: 1978

R_1,2,3: 2174

Synergistic effect: 0.96

№4

Pair: Degraef Margo
Hackemack Lauranne

Wins: 14

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 2.33

Number of matches: 20

R_max: 2810

R_1,2,3: 2533

R_min: 2285

R_1,2,3: 2498

Synergistic effect: 0.99

№5

Pair: Doval Ilka
Degraef Margo

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 2187

R_1,2,3: 2182

R_min: 403

R_1,2,3: 2023

Synergistic effect: 0.11

№6

Pair: Degraef Margo
Ivannikova Anna

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2142

R_1,2,3: 2142

R_min: 3606

R_1,2,3: 3606

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Vivarelli Debora
Degraef Margo

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 121

R_1,2,3: 121

R_min: 219

R_1,2,3: 219

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Zhang Sofia-Xuan
Degraef Margo

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 148

R_1,2,3: 148

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Degraef Margo
Maesen Marie

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3020

R_1,2,3: 3809

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Degraef Margo
Marijsse Delfien

Wins: 0

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1027

R_1,2,3: 2012

Synergistic effect: 0.52

№11

Pair: Degraef Margo
Kukulkova Tatiana

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 118

R_1,2,3: 118

Synergistic effect: 0.46