A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

Player
Country
Category
Time
- 2024


Pair
Wins
Defeats
Ratio
Number of matches
Rmax
R1,2,3
Rmin
R1,2,3
Synergistic effect
1
Wins: 7
Defeats: 13
Ratio: 0.54
Number of matches: 20
Rmax: 4186
R1,2,3: 3090
Rmin: 701
R1,2,3: 1765
Synergistic effect: 2.32
2
Wins: 6
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 6
Number of matches: 7
Rmax: 3009
R1,2,3: 2127
Rmin: 2798
R1,2,3: 2798
Synergistic effect: 1.37
3
Wins: 10
Defeats: 8
Ratio: 1.25
Number of matches: 18
Rmax: 2811
R1,2,3: 2188
Rmin: 602
R1,2,3: 1095
Synergistic effect: 0.88
4
Wins: 22
Defeats: 17
Ratio: 1.29
Number of matches: 39
Rmax: 2777
R1,2,3: 2266
Rmin: 508
R1,2,3: 1059
Synergistic effect: 0.86
5
Wins: 3
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 3
Number of matches: 4
Rmax: 2590
R1,2,3: 1718
Rmin: 2329
R1,2,3: 2329
Synergistic effect: 1.19
6
Wins: 11
Defeats: 8
Ratio: 1.38
Number of matches: 19
Rmax: 2527
R1,2,3: 2414
Rmin: 1579
R1,2,3: 1749
Synergistic effect: 1.02
7
Wins: 2
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 2
Number of matches: 3
Rmax: 2128
R1,2,3: 2034
Rmin: 1981
R1,2,3: 1981
Synergistic effect: 1.35
8
Wins: 6
Defeats: 7
Ratio: 0.86
Number of matches: 13
Rmax: 1756
R1,2,3: 1301
Rmin: 535
R1,2,3: 760
Synergistic effect: 0.75
9
Wins: 4
Defeats: 3
Ratio: 1.33
Number of matches: 7
Rmax: 1667
R1,2,3: 1459
Rmin: 1885
R1,2,3: 1952
Synergistic effect: 1.36
10
Wins: 4
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 4
Number of matches: 5
Rmax: 1569
R1,2,3: 685
Rmin: 811
R1,2,3: 811
Synergistic effect: 0.87
11
Wins: 0
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 0
Number of matches: 1
Rmax: 0
R1,2,3:
Rmin: 867
R1,2,3: 867
Synergistic effect: -
12
Wins: 0
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 0
Number of matches: 1
Rmax: 0
R1,2,3:
Rmin: 4095
R1,2,3: 4095
Synergistic effect: -