A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Codina Ana
Arguelles Camila

Wins: 37

Defeats: 25

Ratio: 1.48

Number of matches: 62

R_max: 11904

R_1,2,3: 9311

R_min: 106

R_1,2,3: 454

Synergistic effect: 1.16

№2

Pair: Molero Candela
Arguelles Camila

Wins: 24

Defeats: 15

Ratio: 1.6

Number of matches: 39

R_max: 7435

R_1,2,3: 5137

R_min: 10

R_1,2,3: 72

Synergistic effect: 2.18

№3

Pair: Harima Maia
Arguelles Camila

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 3267

R_1,2,3: 3267

R_min: 3046

R_1,2,3: 3339

Synergistic effect: 1.23

№4

Pair: Iwasa Agustina
Arguelles Camila

Wins: 5

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 1.25

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 3065

R_1,2,3: 2630

R_min: 2978

R_1,2,3: 3157

Synergistic effect: 1

№5

Pair: Paredes Nathaly
Arguelles Camila

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 385

R_1,2,3: 385

R_min: 3865

R_1,2,3: 3865

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Arguelles Camila
Tofant Ana

Wins: 1

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0.33

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 209

R_1,2,3: 209

R_min: 145

R_1,2,3: 228

Synergistic effect: 0.96

№7

Pair: Estrada Andrea
Arguelles Camila

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2831

R_1,2,3: 2831

Synergistic effect: 0.99

№8

Pair: Marchetti Nathalie
Arguelles Camila

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1379

R_1,2,3: 3432

Synergistic effect: 0.25