A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Dhooria Rohan
Gould Benjamin

Wins: 3

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 0.75

Number of matches: 7

R_max: 2615

R_1,2,3: 2362

R_min: 691

R_1,2,3: 1718

Synergistic effect: 30.48

№2

Pair: Dhooria Rohan
Liang Bob

Wins: 4

Defeats: 11

Ratio: 0.36

Number of matches: 15

R_max: 1047

R_1,2,3: 549

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 449

Synergistic effect: 0.68

№3

Pair: Dhooria Rohan
Hingorani Ishaan

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 344

R_1,2,3: 344

R_min: 3141

R_1,2,3: 3141

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Tsao Erny
Dhooria Rohan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3770

R_1,2,3: 3770

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Zhao Anthony
Dhooria Rohan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1600

R_1,2,3: 3012

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Chambers Dillon
Dhooria Rohan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2254

R_1,2,3: 2254

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Dhooria Rohan
Liang Mike

Wins: 1

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Sulfaro Ivan
Dhooria Rohan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 667

R_1,2,3: 667

Synergistic effect: 0.38

№9

Pair: Dhooria Rohan
Abusev Artur

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1390

R_1,2,3: 1390

Synergistic effect: 0.63

№10

Pair: Dhooria Rohan
Cosgriff Luke

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 951

R_1,2,3: 1482

Synergistic effect: 0.65

№11

Pair: Dhooria Rohan
Zenaidee Zaki

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 1425

R_1,2,3: 1517

Synergistic effect: -

№12

Pair: Dhooria Rohan
Patiranalage Dishanka

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 478

R_1,2,3: 1306

Synergistic effect: 0.67