A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

Player
Country
Category
Time
- 2024


Pair
Wins
Defeats
Ratio
Number of matches
Rmax
R1,2,3
Rmin
R1,2,3
Synergistic effect
1
Wins: 4
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 4
Number of matches: 5
Rmax: 4065
R1,2,3: 3529
Rmin: 4197
R1,2,3: 4197
Synergistic effect: 1.09
2
Wins: 3
Defeats: 2
Ratio: 1.5
Number of matches: 5
Rmax: 3290
R1,2,3: 2228
Rmin: 2981
R1,2,3: 3614
Synergistic effect: 0.63
3
Wins: 2
Defeats: 2
Ratio: 1
Number of matches: 4
Rmax: 3275
R1,2,3: 2821
Rmin: 3677
R1,2,3: 3840
Synergistic effect: 1.15
4
Wins: 20
Defeats: 6
Ratio: 3.33
Number of matches: 26
Rmax: 2771
R1,2,3: 2379
Rmin: 1721
R1,2,3: 1841
Synergistic effect: 1.07
5
Wins: 8
Defeats: 3
Ratio: 2.67
Number of matches: 11
Rmax: 2736
R1,2,3: 2497
Rmin: 1409
R1,2,3: 2217
Synergistic effect: 1.07
6
Wins: 4
Defeats: 4
Ratio: 1
Number of matches: 8
Rmax: 2678
R1,2,3: 1872
Rmin: 2115
R1,2,3: 2620
Synergistic effect: 0.91
7
Wins: 5
Defeats: 3
Ratio: 1.67
Number of matches: 8
Rmax: 2377
R1,2,3: 2047
Rmin: 1941
R1,2,3: 2588
Synergistic effect: 0.99
8
Wins: 1
Defeats: 2
Ratio: 0.5
Number of matches: 3
Rmax: 1543
R1,2,3: 1543
Rmin: 1723
R1,2,3: 3238
Synergistic effect: 0.83
9
Wins: 8
Defeats: 2
Ratio: 4
Number of matches: 10
Rmax: 1505
R1,2,3: 1349
Rmin: 1224
R1,2,3: 1328
Synergistic effect: 1.09
10
Wins: 1
Defeats: 0
Ratio: 1
Number of matches: 1
Rmax: 1000
R1,2,3: 1000
Rmin: 0
R1,2,3:
Synergistic effect: -