A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Bergand Filippa
Holmsten Ellen

Wins: 6

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 1.2

Number of matches: 11

R_max: 4942

R_1,2,3: 3740

R_min: 2261

R_1,2,3: 2445

Synergistic effect: 1.4

№2

Pair: Kallberg Christina
Holmsten Ellen

Wins: 48

Defeats: 26

Ratio: 1.85

Number of matches: 74

R_max: 3969

R_1,2,3: 3803

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 490

Synergistic effect: 0.91

№3

Pair: Holmsten Ellen
Bundesmann Anne

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2932

R_1,2,3: 2932

R_min: 3437

R_1,2,3: 3437

Synergistic effect: 1.02

№4

Pair: Front Erika
Holmsten Ellen

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 2379

R_1,2,3: 2379

R_min: 2238

R_1,2,3: 2456

Synergistic effect: 0.88

№5

Pair: Holmsten Ellen
Payet Denise

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1164

R_1,2,3: 1164

Synergistic effect: 0.43

№6

Pair: Holmsten Ellen
Lu Hua Yu

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2407

R_1,2,3: 2407

Synergistic effect: 0.89