A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Meringdal Fredrik
Hoel Mats

Wins: 1

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 493

R_1,2,3: 493

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: -

№2

Pair: Brandtzaeg Edvard
Hoel Mats

Wins: 2

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.4

Number of matches: 7

R_max: 99

R_1,2,3: 50

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 692

Synergistic effect: -

№3

Pair: Nyberg Jan
Hoel Mats

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 718

R_1,2,3: 718

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Hoel Mats
Prusa David

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 575

R_1,2,3: 962

Synergistic effect: -