A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Devos Laurens
Kosolosky Olav

Wins: 18

Defeats: 23

Ratio: 0.78

Number of matches: 41

R_max: 6943

R_1,2,3: 4825

R_min: 166

R_1,2,3: 403

Synergistic effect: 10.69

№2

Pair: Devos Robin
Devos Laurens

Wins: 6

Defeats: 8

Ratio: 0.75

Number of matches: 14

R_max: 3252

R_1,2,3: 3000

R_min: 819

R_1,2,3: 1995

Synergistic effect: 0.41

№3

Pair: Devos Laurens
Cnudde Florian

Wins: 8

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 1.6

Number of matches: 13

R_max: 2797

R_1,2,3: 2538

R_min: 1887

R_1,2,3: 2020

Synergistic effect: 0.89

№4

Pair: Mutti Matteo
Devos Laurens

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1690

R_1,2,3: 1690

R_min: 7502

R_1,2,3: 7502

Synergistic effect: 1.22

№5

Pair: Darcis Thibaut
Devos Laurens

Wins: 3

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 0.75

Number of matches: 7

R_max: 1321

R_1,2,3: 862

R_min: 907

R_1,2,3: 1807

Synergistic effect: 0.49

№6

Pair: Devos Laurens
Gaspar Romain

Wins: 9

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 2.25

Number of matches: 13

R_max: 1273

R_1,2,3: 1124

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 986

Synergistic effect: 1.14

№7

Pair: Devos Laurens
Cathcart Owen

Wins: 6

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 6

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 678

R_1,2,3: 377

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: 1.54

№8

Pair: Janssens Matthias
Devos Laurens

Wins: 0

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 858

R_1,2,3: 1275

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Devos Laurens
Lee Pak Ho

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1792

R_1,2,3: 1792

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Devos Laurens
Closset Tom

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 99

R_1,2,3: 99

Synergistic effect: -

№11

Pair: Devos Laurens
Degros Nicolas

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 476

R_1,2,3: 476

Synergistic effect: 0.34