A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Pinto Daniele
Amato Antonino

Wins: 28

Defeats: 19

Ratio: 1.47

Number of matches: 47

R_max: 5167

R_1,2,3: 4586

R_min: 1138

R_1,2,3: 1572

Synergistic effect: 1.44

№2

Pair: Mutti Matteo
Amato Antonino

Wins: 7

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 1.4

Number of matches: 12

R_max: 3091

R_1,2,3: 1648

R_min: 1386

R_1,2,3: 1569

Synergistic effect: 1.18

№3

Pair: Piciulin Gabriele
Amato Antonino

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1289

R_1,2,3: 1289

R_min: 1099

R_1,2,3: 1099

Synergistic effect: 0.61

№4

Pair: Piccolin Jordy
Amato Antonino

Wins: 2

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.4

Number of matches: 7

R_max: 1030

R_1,2,3: 525

R_min: 234

R_1,2,3: 342

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Wheeler Christopher
Amato Antonino

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 576

R_1,2,3: 576

R_min: 1591

R_1,2,3: 1936

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Cerza Matteo
Amato Antonino

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2713

R_1,2,3: 2713

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Oyebode John
Amato Antonino

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1790

R_1,2,3: 2859

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Amato Antonino
Puppo Enrico

Wins: 1

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Glod Eric
Amato Antonino

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 812

R_1,2,3: 812

Synergistic effect: 0.27

№10

Pair: Amato Antonino
Bertolini Eric

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 559

R_1,2,3: 559

Synergistic effect: -