A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

Player
Country
Category
Time
- 2024


Pair
Wins
Defeats
Ratio
Number of matches
Rmax
R1,2,3
Rmin
R1,2,3
Synergistic effect
1
Wins: 6
Defeats: 3
Ratio: 2
Number of matches: 9
Rmax: 13965
R1,2,3: 11068
Rmin: 5410
R1,2,3: 10215
Synergistic effect: 0.95
2
Wins: 57
Defeats: 23
Ratio: 2.48
Number of matches: 80
Rmax: 11995
R1,2,3: 11698
Rmin: 390
R1,2,3: 476
Synergistic effect: 1.04
3
Wins: 2
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 2
Number of matches: 3
Rmax: 11836
R1,2,3: 10396
Rmin: 6426
R1,2,3: 6426
Synergistic effect: 1.21
4
Wins: 24
Defeats: 7
Ratio: 3.43
Number of matches: 31
Rmax: 6081
R1,2,3: 4645
Rmin: 1667
R1,2,3: 1899
Synergistic effect: 1.1
5
Wins: 29
Defeats: 11
Ratio: 2.64
Number of matches: 40
Rmax: 3284
R1,2,3: 2880
Rmin: 1427
R1,2,3: 1925
Synergistic effect: 0.87
6
Wins: 5
Defeats: 3
Ratio: 1.67
Number of matches: 8
Rmax: 3035
R1,2,3: 2841
Rmin: 812
R1,2,3: 2926
Synergistic effect: 0.64
7
Wins: 20
Defeats: 4
Ratio: 5
Number of matches: 24
Rmax: 2692
R1,2,3: 2054
Rmin: 1496
R1,2,3: 1669
Synergistic effect: 0.83
8
Wins: 4
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 4
Number of matches: 5
Rmax: 2620
R1,2,3: 1083
Rmin: 2457
R1,2,3: 2457
Synergistic effect: 1.61
9
Wins: 3
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 3
Number of matches: 4
Rmax: 2024
R1,2,3: 839
Rmin: 2483
R1,2,3: 2483
Synergistic effect: 0.83
10
Wins: 0
Defeats: 3
Ratio: 0
Number of matches: 3
Rmax: 0
R1,2,3:
Rmin: 1187
R1,2,3: 1960
Synergistic effect: 0.73