A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Kallberg Christina
Roose Alma

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 4287

R_1,2,3: 1790

R_min: 3523

R_1,2,3: 3523

Synergistic effect: 2.82

№2

Pair: Edvinsson Jennie
Roose Alma

Wins: 14

Defeats: 9

Ratio: 1.56

Number of matches: 23

R_max: 3098

R_1,2,3: 2370

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 1249

Synergistic effect: 2.8

№3

Pair: Roose Alma
Muskantor Rebecca

Wins: 6

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 1.2

Number of matches: 11

R_max: 3077

R_1,2,3: 2607

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 421

Synergistic effect: 5

№4

Pair: Bergand Filippa
Roose Alma

Wins: 1

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 2419

R_1,2,3: 2419

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: 1.18

№5

Pair: Payet Denise
Roose Alma

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 1724

R_1,2,3: 862

R_min: 2819

R_1,2,3: 2819

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Roose Alma
Svensson Agnes

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 42

R_1,2,3: 42

R_min: 212

R_1,2,3: 212

Synergistic effect: 14

№7

Pair: Zarins Tova
Roose Alma

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2590

R_1,2,3: 2590

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Hansson Matilda
Roose Alma

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2508

R_1,2,3: 2508

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Roose Alma
Ekman Emelie

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2792

R_1,2,3: 2792

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Roose Alma
Tanska Caroline

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3783

R_1,2,3: 3783

Synergistic effect: -

№11

Pair: Roose Alma
Rodriguez Isabel

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -

№12

Pair: Roose Alma
Holgersson Hannah

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 2920

R_1,2,3: 2920

Synergistic effect: -