A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Israeli Tal
Chesterman Samuel

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 481

R_1,2,3: 241

R_min: 583

R_1,2,3: 583

Synergistic effect: -

№2

Pair: Bu Alexander
Chesterman Samuel

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 638

R_1,2,3: 638

Synergistic effect: -

№3

Pair: Cicchitti Alessandro
Chesterman Samuel

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 550

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Chamdal Reece
Chesterman Samuel

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1315

R_1,2,3: 1315

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Chesterman Samuel
Walsh Ethan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 330

R_1,2,3: 330

Synergistic effect: 0.67

№6

Pair: Chesterman Samuel
Cope Joseph

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 106

R_1,2,3: 106

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Degros Nicolas
Chesterman Samuel

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 437

R_1,2,3: 707

Synergistic effect: -