A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Li Hsin-Yu
Peng Chih

Wins: 10

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 10

Number of matches: 10

R_max: 1937

R_1,2,3: 1599

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: 1.27

№2

Pair: Huang Yan-Cheng
Peng Chih

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 1769

R_1,2,3: 745

R_min: 1420

R_1,2,3: 1420

Synergistic effect: 1.1

№3

Pair: Hsu Po-Hsuan
Peng Chih

Wins: 16

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 2.67

Number of matches: 22

R_max: 1395

R_1,2,3: 1249

R_min: 114

R_1,2,3: 631

Synergistic effect: 0.67

№4

Pair: Chen Jun-Ting
Peng Chih

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 1263

R_1,2,3: 857

R_min: 1246

R_1,2,3: 1246

Synergistic effect: 0.81

№5

Pair: Tai Ming-Wei
Peng Chih

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 16

R_1,2,3: 16

Synergistic effect: 0.01

№6

Pair: Ahmadian Amin
Peng Chih

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1262

R_1,2,3: 1262

Synergistic effect: 0.71

№7

Pair: Peng Chih
Lu Cheng-Che

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 665

R_1,2,3: 665

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Lin Yen-Chun
Peng Chih

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 1554

R_1,2,3: 1554

Synergistic effect: 0.97