A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Widing Charlie
Alfredsson Isak

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 180

R_1,2,3: 90

R_min: 800

R_1,2,3: 800

Synergistic effect: -

№2

Pair: Alfredsson Isak
Bergenblock William

Wins: 3

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1.5

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 51

R_1,2,3: 32

R_min: 3

R_1,2,3: 83

Synergistic effect: 4.57

№3

Pair: Alfredsson Isak
Alnaser Rawad

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 2

R_1,2,3: 1

R_min: 365

R_1,2,3: 365

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Alfredsson Isak
Sjogren Elias

Wins: 1

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Kallberg Anton
Alfredsson Isak

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 59

R_1,2,3: 59

Synergistic effect: 0.05

№6

Pair: Alfredsson Isak
Johnsson Emil

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 180

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Bjorkryd David
Alfredsson Isak

Wins: 3

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1.5

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 2

R_1,2,3: 186

Synergistic effect: 0.04

№8

Pair: Alfredsson Isak
Samokhin Aleksei

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 284

R_1,2,3: 284

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Alfredsson Isak
Arpas Samuel

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -